Some time ago my sibling fell ill with cancer, as it turned out there was a tram line outside the window. Doctors determined that the cause of cancer is the influence of electromagnetic energy from this line.

It was quite a long time ago. There was no internet back then! We currently have internet in schools and wireless connections between computers, laptops in classrooms and the central server. Ask teachers how they feel during the time they teach at school every day.

What about the kids? Their organisms are still developing and are not yet fully formed. Not to mention the reproductive system! Who can know what deformities their children will have in the future?

Coming to the merits of the matter - already then I managed to develop a method of purifying electromagnetic fields from their harmful properties. The method itself and the devices are patented.

In my opinion, you should check in at least one classroom how learning will look like from the point of view of the teacher and children when protected by our devices!

From an investment standpoint, there is nothing to worry about as the devices have a one year money back guarantee for whatever reason.

It's worth a try, because time flies and you don't know what tomorrow will bring! Perhaps someone will get some serious illness and will be wondering, that's why they didn't think about protection sooner! 

Find specific solutions below or skip to this link - Just One Solution - CLICK

TOP

At school: .

We know that electromagnetic fields operate 24 hours a day and are very harmful. The most harmful are WIFI at night, then the body rests and is attacked with much greater intensity than during the day.

Regardless, modernity introduces wireless connections between laptops and the server. Each student in the class gets their own laptop or tablet. Thus, in one classroom, there are 20 or more independent wireless Wi-Fi connections to the server.

If teachers suffer from the effects of WIFI electromagnetic fields, how will teenagers' bodies behave when exposed to the same WiFi?

The body of a child or teenager is much weaker and more susceptible to the negative impact of electromagnetic fields (including WIFI).

An additional question - what will happen to the reproductive potential of teenagers exposed to such aggressive effects of electromagnetic fields?

For more information, please contact us here.

TOP

TOP

Experiment

It started with observations and questions.

Girls found that if they slept with a mobile phone to their head at night, they often had difficulty concentrating at school the next day. They wanted to test the effects of mobile phone radiation on humans, but their school, Hjallerup School in Denmark, did not have the equipment to conduct such an experiment. So the girls designed an experiment that instead tested the effects of cell phone radiation on a plant.

For the next 12 days, the girls observed, measured, weighed and photographed their results. At the end of the experiment, the results were glaringly obvious - cress seeds placed near the router did not germinate. Many of them were completely dead. Meanwhile, cress seeds planted in the other room, away from the routers, were blooming.

The difficulty is that once installed in schools, they are always on. Whether children use them or not, they are exposed to this level of radiation.

Over the last few years, the iPad has become the best friend and protector of many adults. It is used as a computer, e-book reader, camera, video/music player, word processor, communication device, drawing tool, game console and more.

When the iPad WiFi + 3G was launched, technicians discovered not three but five antennas, including the frame of the LCD display as a giant antenna.

This means that if you do not handle your iPad exactly as instructed, the RF radiation may exceed government human exposure limits. Unfortunately, most parents and teachers are unaware of this and have never given the manufacturer's instructions to children using iPads.

Male workers may be reluctant to be in a wireless environment due to the potential decrease in male fertility. Exposure of human sperm to a wireless laptop or mobile phone reduces sperm motility (Avendano et al., 2010; Wdowiak et al., 2007; Erogul et al., 2006; Agarwal et al., 2008; Agarwal et al., 2008b; Fejes et al. et al., 2005). Mobile phones reduce sperm viability and are associated with an increase in the percentage of sperm with abnormal morphology/shape. In standby mode, mobile phones significantly reduce sperm motility and count (in rabbits; Salama et al., 2008). Cordless laptops and mobile phone radiation have been shown to damage human sperm DNA (Avendano et al., 2010; De Iuliis et al., 2009) and mouse sperm DNA (Aitken et al., 2005). It is likely that men working with wireless technologies will have reduced fertility. More examples and details in "Scientific Research".

Some studies have shown cognitive decline** with exposure to mobile phone EMFs (especially chronic exposure; e.g. Maier et al., 2004 - human; Nittby et al., 2008 - juvenile rats, very low powers, 2h/week exposure for 55 weeks). Other studies have shown no effect; some acute studies have shown cognitive improvement (Lai, 2007). The question is whether it is desirable for technology that should assist in education to have detrimental effects on cognitive performance in certain circumstances. More examples and details in "Scientific Research".

Apparently WiFi is a new form. In central Ontario, parents are lobbying a school to turn off Wi-Fi out of fear that their children will get sick. You can take news reports about parents' concerns, go back in time about ten years into the past, and replace "WiFi" with "mold" - the arguments are the same and the evidence is weak, but the problem identified has just changed. .

Some parents in the Barrie, Ontario area say their children show a range of symptoms, from headaches and dizziness to nausea and even a rapid heartbeat.

There has been an outbreak of the epidemic in the local high school in recent months. Memory loss, dizziness, drowsiness, nausea, skin rashes. It was also a brand new school where construction of one wing continued. They closed one wing, ran multiple environmental quality tests that showed nothing, and eventually reopened it and said people were imagining it. Some people changed schools.

But the real problem is the University of Ontario has turned off Wi-Fi on campus. The president of U who made the decision is a biologist. His position was that until proven safe, let's be careful because WiFi is convenience. Sounds pretty reasonable if you don't know the evidence. The problem, however, is that he is a scientific authority for many confused people who will see his performance as an indictment on a Wi-Fi network.

TOP

TOP

TOP

TOP

TOP

TOP

TOP